In imagination we think ourselves 2000 years back. What wonder should fill us: a week, and the world has become different. The world that had been for thousands of years like the lost sheep was now the sheep found, taken upon His shoulders by the Son of God become the Son of man. The unbridgeable gap that sin had created between God and man was now at least incipiently bridged; God had entered into history, God Himself had become man. God had taken flesh, and all things visible, what we perceive in our blindness as dead, inert matter, could in His body recognise itself in glory. Something absolutely new had occurred, the world was no longer the same.
Tuesday, 14 January 2014
A Week After Christmas
In imagination we think ourselves 2000 years back. What wonder should fill us: a week, and the world has become different. The world that had been for thousands of years like the lost sheep was now the sheep found, taken upon His shoulders by the Son of God become the Son of man. The unbridgeable gap that sin had created between God and man was now at least incipiently bridged; God had entered into history, God Himself had become man. God had taken flesh, and all things visible, what we perceive in our blindness as dead, inert matter, could in His body recognise itself in glory. Something absolutely new had occurred, the world was no longer the same.
Sunday, 12 January 2014
Religious nuts or devoted believers?
A humbling reminder...
Religious nuts or devoted believers?
God is Motion
God is Motion by Met. Georges Khodr
http://araborthodoxy.blogspot.com/2014/01/met-georges-khodr-god-is-motion.html
I am always struck by the words of the Nazarene, "Love your neighbor as yourself." He never once said, "Strive for your neighbor to love you." Love is an act of going to the other, not of attracting an emotion. Christ never once said, "Seek to be loved." You come into being by abandoning yourself. This is the mystery of humanity, that one of us subsists in himself or for himself. You exist in and with others. Human existence is communion: Your Lord knows you if you love. You exist if you forget yourself in your act of going to the other.
Individualism is true if you mean by it the independence of each one of us from the tyranny of the group, but individualism is not withdrawal or isolation. Personhood is contemporary philosophy does not mean isolation or inward withdrawal. It is the confirmation of the self in love because the self exists in communion.
There is no contradiction between sound individualism and existing in society, because a good society does not eliminate the rational and loving self. Indeed, it can only exist in it. The group is not a herd because the herd has no love in it.
"Love your neighbor as yourself" because he is your equal, because the two of you are one before the Lord. The one whom you love is not necessarily your friend. You love because you come into existence through love insofar as it is going out from the "I" into the "we". Truth is in the "we". Egoism is exclusionary, but love is confirmed and confirms the other at the same time. It is not possible for you to love the other unless you subsist within yourself (and I did not say "subsist in yourself"). For you to subsist within yourself also means that you subsist in the other. You cannot be in yourself if you are not one with the Lord. If the Lord is not within you, you are deadly for yourself, you eat yourself.
Love is not in rejecting the self. It is in rejecting the closed-off ego. If you go out to the other by casting egoism out of yourself, you return to yourself free. The one who loves does not hate himself. He hates to monopolize himself. Loving yourself, insofar as your self is from God, is loving God. It is gaining God for yourself, since if you do not make God your own, how can He be? If you do not understand that He is motion, He will not reach you. He is fixed in His motion.
God is a movement of love. We have only known Him in His supporting His people and no one knows Him unless the Lord Himself moves towards him. God is constantly in a state of coming down. This is the true meaning of inspiration. God is revelation. Yes, the Lord is fixed. This fixedness is His love.
Love is movement. It is you believing that the other is fundamental for you, even for your breathing. If you move toward the face of the other, you find the face of God. In your isolated tower, you have no god. It is your suicide. You do not face God by Himself. You find in Him others, because God is in the group, in love. There is nothing that will be revealed to you if you do not go out of yourself to it and to others. You have no existence with your Lord if you are not with others. He is on their faces-- it is there that you read Him.
Thursday, 9 January 2014
Theosis and the Life of Prayer
"Prayer that is strong, that has purpose, that has meaning, is prayer offered from all the heart, all the mind, all the soul, all the strength. This is the prayer of love. Every prayer offered to God that lacks these four sources - heart, soul, mind, and strength - will result in monotony and dreariness..."
"...The concept of union occupies a very lofty place in Orthodox thought. Union with the Holy Trinity is, indeed, foundational to Orthodoxy. However, it is sometimes misunderstood by certain theologians (who study without spiritual understanding) that union is the end of the road. That is, they teach that after we pray a lot, and fast a lot, and spend a very long time in asceticism, then we will achieve union with God. No, beloved; union can occur from the age of three or four, if only you are taught to stand and pray before God with all your heart, mind, soul, and strength."
+ Fr Matthew the Poor, "On Love" in "Words for our Time" (Chesterton: Conciliar Press, 2012) 65-67
Wednesday, 8 January 2014
Fr Alexander Schmemann on Political Crisis
On the eve of the Christmas fast, we are trying to preach to the students why the coming of God into the world in the form of a small child is not only a kenosis—a self-emptying of divinity—but the most adequate revelation of God. In that Child, there is no need for strength, glory, “rights,” self-affirmation, authority or power.
Monday, 6 January 2014
Our greatest missionary work
I told the brotherhood that it should always be a priority for it to perform the Divine Liturgy in the Monastery. The prayers of the Divine Liturgy should not be intoned for personal gratification because at that moment the priests are expressing the prayers of all those praying in Church. And for this reason the priests should not be praying with self-centered feelings. We do not celebrate as individuals."
On Baptism & Liturgical Life
Baptism and the Final Destruction of Demons
by Fr Stephen Freeman
http://glory2godforallthings.com/2014/01/06/baptism-and-the-final-destruction-of-demons/
Final is not a word you often hear in Christian teaching. Most Christians leave the final things until, well, the End. But this is not the language of the fathers nor of the Church. A good illustration can be found in the Orthodox service of Holy Baptism. During the blessing of the waters the priest prays:
And grant to [this water] the grace of redemption, the blessing of Jordan. Make it the fountain of incorruption, the gift of sanctification, the remission of sins, the remedy of infirmities; the final destruction of demons, unassailable by hostile powers, filled with angelic might. Let those who would ensnare Your creature flee far from it. For we have called upon Your Name, O Lord, and it is wonderful, and glorious, and awesome even to adversaries.
What can it possibly mean to ask that the waters be made "the final destruction of demons"?
The nature of the waters of Baptism reveals the Orthodox understanding of the world. These waters, now in a font, are none other than the waters of the Jordan. They are an incorruptible fountain and all the things we ask for. They are the final destruction of demons because they are nothing other than Christ's Pascha. The waters of the font are Christ's death on the Cross and His destruction of Hades. They are the resurrection of the dead.
For this reason St. Paul can say:
Do you not know that as many of us as were baptized into Christ Jesus were baptized into His death? Therefore we were buried with Him through baptism into death, that just as Christ was raised from the dead by the glory of the Father, even so we should walk in newness of life (Rom. 6:3-4).
The realism of St. Paul's teaching on Baptism is mystical realism (to coin a phrase). These waters become those waters. This event becomes that event. This time is now that time. Christ's death now becomes my death. Christ's resurrection now becomes my resurrection.
How utterly and uselessly weak is the thought that Baptism is merely an obedience to a command given by Christ! The idea that nothing happens in Baptism is both contrary to Scripture and a denial of the very nature of our salvation.
The anti-sacramentalism (and non-sacramentalism) of some Christian groups is among the most unwittingly pernicious of all modern errors. Thought to be an argument about a minor point of doctrine, it is, instead, the collapse of the world into the empty literalism of secularity. In the literalism of the modern world (where a thing is a thing is a thing), nothing is ever more than what is seen. Thus every spiritual reality, every mystery, must be referred elsewhere - generally to the mind of God and the believer. Christianity becomes an ideology and a fantasy. It turns religious believing into a two-storey universe.
The reality of in the Incarnate God was not obvious to those around Him: no surgery would have revealed His Godhood. The proclamation of the Gospel, from its most primitive beginnings ("the Kingdom of God is at hand"), announces the in-breaking of a mystical reality. Many modern theologians misunderstand Christ's (and St. John the Baptist's) preaching on the Kingdom to refer to an imminent end of the age. They hear, "The Kingdom of heaven is at hand," to mean, "the End of the world is near." Thus we have protestant theologians creating an "interim ethic" to cover Christian activity in the "in-between" period - between Christ's first coming and His second. If the coming of the incarnate God into the world did not fundamentally alter something, then the preaching of Jesus was in vain and radically misunderstood by His disciples.
The Gospels presume and proclaim at every turn that in Christ, the Kingdom of God is present. Christ says, "But if I cast out demons with the finger of God, surely the kingdom of God has come upon you" (Lk 11:20). There is a mystery at work in the presence of the Kingdom. Christ makes statements such as that just quoted, but also frequently says that the Kingdom of God has come near. The Kingdom is a reality and a presence that has both come near us, and come upon us. But in neither case does it simply refer to a later "someday." The urgency of the proclamation of the Kingdom is not caused by the soon approach of an expected apocalypse. Its preaching is urgent because its coming has already begun!
The sacraments of the Church (indeed the Church itself) should never be reduced to "holy moments" or "instances of miracles" in the life of an otherwise spiritually inert world. If bread and wine become the Body and Blood of Christ, then the Kingdom of God has come upon us! And nothing less.
The sacramental life of the Church is not an aspect of the Church's life - it is a manifestation of the whole life of the Church. It is, indeed, the very character and nature of the Church's life. The Church does not have sacraments - the Church is a sacrament. We do not eat sacraments or just participate in the sacraments - we are sacraments. The sacraments reveal the true character of our life in Christ. This is why St. Paul can say:
I am crucified with Christ, nevertheless I live, yet not I but Christ liveth in me, etc. (Galatians 2:20)
I am...nevertheless I...yet not I...but Christ.... This is the language of the mystical reality birthed into the world in the Incarnation of Christ. Thus we can say: This is the Blood of Christ...nevertheless you see bread...but it is not bread...but Christ's Body sacrificed for you. This is the Hades of Christ's death and the Paradise of His resurrection...nevertheless it is the water of Baptism...but it is not water...but Christ's death and resurrection into which you are baptized.
And so we see the whole world - for the "whole world is sacrament" - in the words of Patriarch Bartholomew. We struggle with language to find a way to say "is...nevertheless...yet not...but is." This is always the difficulty in expressing the mystery. It is difficult, not because it is less than real, but because of the character and nature of its reality. Modern Christian thought and language that simply dismiss the mystery and postpone its coming, or deny the character of its reality, change the most essential elements of the Christian faith and inadvertently create a new religion.
But we have been taught something different. We have been given the Final Destruction of Demons, the Mystical Supper, the Kingdom of God. Why should we look for something less?
Happy Feast of the Nativity of our Lord
"The body of the Word, then, being a real human body, in spite of its having been uniquely formed from a virgin, was of itself mortal and, like other bodies, liable to death. But the indwelling of the Word loosed it from this natural liability, so that corruption could not touch it. Thus is happened that two opposite marvels took place at once: the death of all was consummated in the Lord's body; yet, because the Word was in it, death and corruption were in the same act utterly abolished."
+ St Athanasius of Alexandria
Sunday, 5 January 2014
Is “Write” Wrong?: A Discussion of Iconology Lingo
http://www.orthodoxartsjournal.org/is-write-wrong-a-discussion-of-iconology-lingo-2/
Professor John Yiannias, Ph.D., expert in Early Christian and Byzantine Art, University of Pittsburgh, has a bold opinion on the issue of why “write” is the wrong verb to use for making an icon.
Friday, 3 January 2014
The Icon Redefined
From the little I've read or heard from Orthodox writers or speakers concerning Iconography, there's a popular sentiment that the 'carnal' 'realism' of 'Western' art is either spiritually deficient or reflective of 'Western' rationalism and scholasticism. "Redefining the Icon" by Evan Freeman challenges these presuppositions and suggests that reading icons or any sacred art in this way is subtly docetist.
But does style affect theology or is content the defining factor? How does this apply to the maxim of lex orandi est lex credendi? What about musical styles if we look at hymnography and hymnology? Does this redefining of the icon impact other aspects of our liturgical life?
Still, it is good to see this kind of historical reflection and critical research coming from within the Orthodox world, which challenges us not to package our theology or to claim an unequivocal 'perspective' when there's still so much to encounter and live in the depth and width and height of the Holy Church...the Life in Christ.
Forgive me and pray for me a sinner.
Here is the post included for reference:
+++







