Sister Vassa presents a compelling case and comes to some interesting conclusions that Orthodox Churches might need to consider. Her article points out the importance of understanding our theology and building on the legacy of the fathers to speak, address, encounter and heal contemporary discourse and those around us.
What is “Ritual Impurity” and Why?
by Sister Vassa Larin (St Vladimir’s Theological Quarterly 52:3-4 (2008) 275-92.)
Source:
http://www.descentoftheholyspirit.org/articles/article9.html
1 What is “Ritual Impurity” and Why?[1]
When I entered a convent of the Russian Orthodox Church Abroad in France, I was introduced to the restrictions imposed on a nun when she has her [monthly] period. Although she was allowed to go to church and pray, she was not to go to Communion; she could not kiss the icons or touch the Antidoron; she could not help bake prosphoras or handle them, nor could she help clean the church; she could not even light the lampada or iconlamp that hung before the icons in her own cell: this last rule was explained to me when I noticed an unlighted lampada in the icon-corner of another sister. I do not remember that anyone attempted either to question or justify these strictures; we simply presumed that menstruation was a form of “impurity,” and we had to stay away from things holy so as not to somehow defile them.
Today there are different regulations in the Russian Orthodox Church based on the concept of “ritual impurity,” varying from parish to parish, usually depending on the local priest. The popular Nastol’naja Kniga of S. Bulgakov instructs a priest not to allow menstruating women to come to church.[2] In Russia, however, women are generally allowed to come to church during menstruation, but cannot receive Holy Communion, kiss icons, relics, or crosses, touch prosphora or the Antidoron, or drink holy water. [3] In parishes outside Russia, as far as I know, women usually only abstain from going to Communion.