Monday, 17 June 2013

St Isaac the Syrian: A Theologian of Love and Mercy

St. Isaac was born in Beth Qatraye, an ancient province on the northeast coast of the Arabian Peninsula that now includes Qatar and the United Arab Emirates. The only date we have to fix him in history is A.D. 676, when George, the Catholicos (or Patriarch) of the Persian Church, took St. Isaac from his monastic tranquillity and made him Bishop of Nineveh in Mesopotamia. After only five months as Bishop, he fled back to the wilderness and lived the rest of his life as a hermit in the mountains of Beth Huzaye – the modern Khuzistan in southwestern Iran. (http://htmp.org/St-Isaac-Ascetical-Homilies/about-st-isaac-and-his-writing.html)

St Isaac the Syrian: A Theologian of Love and Mercy
By Metropolitan Hilarion Alfeyev

4 aprile 2008 at Basilica di San Giovanni in Laterano
Source: http://www.worldapostoliccongressonmercy.org/IMG/pdf/Bishop_Hilarion_Alfeyev.pdf

In this paper I would like to present the teaching of St Isaac the Syrian, one of the greatest theologians of the Orthodox tradition, on love and mercy.

Sunday, 16 June 2013

Justification

Fr Aidan Kimel has posted another very thoughtful and enriching series that would be of benefit for all Orthodox Christians to read and consider. http://afkimel.wordpress.com/category/justification/ Here is the series in one big re-post:

Saturday, 15 June 2013

Praying with the Body


Metropolitan Kallistos addresses the question of whether there are parallels between the hesychastic method of prayer and other apparently similar techniques of prayer in Hinduism and Islam. Looking at the origins of hesychasm and the teachings of figures such as St Gregory Palamas, St Gregory of Sinai and Nikiphoros the Hesychast, Metropolitan Kallistos addresses the question: is the Jesus Prayer an essential and authentically Christian practice, or is it unnecessary and perhaps even harmful?

From: http://www.bogoslov.ru/en/text/2671134.html


Praying with the body: The hesychast method and non-Christian parallels
By Metropolitan Kallistos Ware

Remember God more often than you breathe.
St Gregory of Nazianzos

Monday, 10 June 2013

Thinking about the One God

Another wonderful post by Fr. Stephen Freeman:
Thinking about the One God
http://glory2godforallthings.com/2013/06/09/thinking-about-the-one-god

There are many things Christians can learn from science – among them is how to think. In thought about the deeper matters of science (particle physics, mathematical theory, etc.), there are a number of accepted rules that are useful in theology as well. One of those is the requirement of “elegance” when constructing a plausible theory. It is understood within scientific and mathematical thought that what is true and accurate as explanation and theory should somehow be “elegant.” For example, there is a simple elegance in Einstein’s E=mc2. That something as universal as the relationship between matter and energy could be expressed in such a simple manner is indeed elegant. Doubtless there might be another manner to express this relationship, a more convoluted and complicated manner, but science would rule it out in favor of Einstein – elegance and simplicity are somehow more accurate as a description of reality. The continued search for a “unified field theory,” a theory that “explains everything,” is not a pipe-dream or figment of the scientific imagination. It is an instinct and understanding that reality is one, that it ultimately “makes sense,” and does so in a manner that can finally be understood and stated in an elegant manner.

Sunday, 9 June 2013

The Blind Man Who Beheld Love

"In the Name of the Father, the Son and the Holy Ghost.

We heard today the story of the man born blind. We do not know from experience what physical blindness is, but we can imagine how this man was walled in himself, how all the world around him existed only as a distant sound, something he could not picture, imagine. He was a prisoner within his own body. He could live by imaginations, he could invent a world around himself, he could by touch and by hearing approximate what really was around him; but the total, full reality could only escape him.

We are not physically blind, but how many of us are locked in themselves! Who of us can say that he is so open that he can perceive all the world in its width, but also in its depth? We meet people, and we see them with our eyes; but seldom it happens that beyond the outer shape, features, clothes, - how often does it happen that we see something of the depth of the person? How seldom it is that we look into a person's eyes and go deep in understanding! We are surrounded by people and every person is unique to God, but are people unique to us? Are not people that surround us just ‘people’, who have names, surnames, nicknames, whom we can recognise by their outer looks but whom we do not know at any depth?

This is our condition: we are blind, we are deaf, we are insensitive to the outer world, and yet, we are called to read meanings. When we meet a person, we should approach this person as a mystery, that is as something which we can discover only by a deep communion, by entering into a relationship, perhaps silent, perhaps in words, but so deep that we can know one another not quite as God knows us, but in the light of God that enlightens all and each of us.

And more than this: we can do, each within his own power, within his own gifts, what Christ did: He opened the eyes of this man. What did this man see? The first thing he saw was the face of the Incarnate Son of God, in other words, he saw love incarnate.

When his eyes met the eyes of Christ, he met God’s compassion, God’s tenderness, God’s earnest concern and understanding. In the same way could so many people begin to see, if by meeting us they meet people in whose eyes, on whose face they could see the shining of earnest, sober love, of a love that is not sentimental but is seeing, a love that can see and understand. And then, how much could we be to people around us a revelation of all the meanings that this world holds and contains through art, through beauty, through science, through all the means by which beauty is perceived and proclaimed among human beings.

But are we doing this? Is our concern to convey the width, and the depth, the beauty and the meaning of things to every person whom we meet? Are we not rather concerned with receiving than with giving?

And yet, Saint Paul who knew what it meant to receive and to give, said, ‘It is a more blessed thing to give than to receive’. And yet how much had he received! He had received the knowledge of God in his own experience; he had received teaching, and knowledge, and experience within the Old Testament, and then Christ revealed Himself to him: what did he not receive!

And yet, he exulted more in giving than in receiving, because he did not want to be the owner of all the richness that had come his way; he wanted to share it, to give it, to set aglow and afire other lives than his own.

Let us reflect on how rich, how richly endowed we are, how much it was given us to see, and to hear. And let us realise at the same time how tragically walled we are within ourselves unless we break this wall in order to give, as generously, as richly, as abundantly as we were given.

And then indeed, our joy will be fulfilled according to Christ’s promise. And no one, nothing will ever be able to take it away from us. Amen!"

+ Metropolitan Anthony Bloom

Pietism

"Without getting too deep into the history of the movement, let us define it simply as the feeling—not so much the teaching, mind you, but the feeling—that the details of doctrine and worship do not really matter. What matters is mostly that you have strong conviction and/or that you are a good moral person."

Read the whole sermon at http://saintpaulemmaus.org/featured/worship-in-spirit-and-truth/

Friday, 7 June 2013

These Two Poles


"Having studied recent Protestant American history and the harm that the conservative/liberal split began to cause to their churches in the early twentieth century, and the harm that it continues to cause, I desired to see if this split was evident within American Orthodoxy. The rhetoric of the conservative/ liberal debate was prevalent in a few statements about the war.

For example, some Orthodox Americans accused the OPF of using theological arguments derived from liberal ideologies, and antiwar Orthodox Americans accused those who supported the war of laying down their faith in the face of conservative political ideologies.

Nevertheless, I was grateful to discover that there is yet to be a conservative/liberal split among Orthodox Americans to the degree that is found among Protestant Americans (in many responses, people wondered why I even asked such a question). 

However, I continue to believe that this danger lies ahead as Orthodoxy becomes increasingly linked to the socio-political facet of American life. Fr. Johns concluding remarks about this potential political split highlights the focus that Orthodox Americans must keep in the years to come: These two political poles bracket the range of choices available to Orthodox Christians in democracies. To me, the most important thing is for all Orthodox to keep their focus on following Jesus Christ within His Church. We must not let our political ideologies become idols, which replace our highest allegiance. We must let the Gospel continuously critique us and whatever political philosophies we hold.

We must listen to our hierarchs when they speak on the ethics of any war. When voting or publicly advocating for or against a war, we must strive to fulfill all three injunctions of the Prophet Micah, “Do justice, love mercy, and walk humbly with your God.”

+ Michael G. Azar, "Orthodox Americans, the Orthodox Peace Fellowship, and Iraq." St Vladimir's Orthodox Theological Seminary, Orthodoxy in America, December 2003

Thursday, 6 June 2013

The Crusader and the Saint

"The saint prays and receives the creation of God with hospitality. The [crusading] missionary preaches and offers, often aggressively, in order to give...The world, however, is healed and transfigured more by the praying saint than by the thundering preachers. It is the saint, who manifesting God's tender love and receiving all creatures in divine hospitality, is genuinely sensitive to the riches of other religions, to different cultures, to 'all sentient beings'. The crusading missionary is afire with the message he proclaims, but can be totally lacking in receptivity and sensitivity... Today we need to combine in our experience of our church the true saint and the genuine missionary whose sole concern is manifesting the kingdom and not annexing new territories."
+ Fr. K.M. George, Malankara Orthodox Syrian Church in India

Tuesday, 4 June 2013

Orthodox Christian Identity in America

Fr. John H. Erickson on "Orthodox Christian Identity in America: Historical Perspectives, Present Challenges" Recorded on November 15, 2012  at St. Herman of Alaska Orthodox Sobor in Edmonton, AB, Canada. www.sthermans.ca

Fr. John is the Dean Emeritus of St. Vladimir's Orthodox Seminary in New York, USA. Recorded



Transcript:

Sunday, 2 June 2013

Who is an Orthodox?


Who is an Orthodox?
27 April 1983

Metropolitan Anthony does not need any introduction from me because you all know him and you know about him. So I won’t take any more time and I will give him the microphone.

MA: First of all may I say that I am very grateful for those who have dared invite me without knowing what I can say. For another thing I always feel impressed by the way in which English audiences applaud the speaker before he has spoken so that they run no risk of not applauding at the end.